teleportation lecture notes

teleportation lecture notes

by Kleon Karapas -
Number of replies: 1

Hello,

I don't understand why the first ket (which is said to be Alices) is ignored in the computation. I also dont understand why the tensor product with  I_3 is ignored (should we not add a subscript 3 to 1 and 2 in the  B_{00} ) bell state at the beginning of the second line).calculation for teleportation

In reply to Kleon Karapas

Re: teleportation lecture notes

by Nicolas Macris -
The ket B_12 in front is not ignored. This is the state of the teo qubits 12 in Alice’s lab.
It is simply not written explicitly in the next few lines who’s purpose is to calculate the state of Bob’s qubit 3.
In this calculation the identity matrix acts trivially on the qubit 3. Once it has ‘acted’, well you dont see the matrix anymore. The tensor sumbol is not written just for convenience: its like when you write axb or a.b or ab. Its a matter of convenience of notation. The subscript 1,2,3 are all at the correct places: this matters if you have many qubits to treat to know what acts on what. Matrices and bras myst multiply kets in their ‘own’ Hilbert space (dont mix apples and oranges).
Hope this helps.
Best